Five words. A political opinion. A slogan. A message of dissent. And now, in Maiduguri, those five words have become the centre of a controversy that goes far beyond five men and five T-shirts.
The police say this is not about the shirts. They allege that the men were involved in conduct capable of causing a breach of public peace and that suspected illicit substances were recovered from them.
Amnesty International tells a radically different story, arguing that the drug allegation is being used to justify what it considers an unlawful detention of people who were simply expressing political opposition.
The men have been charged. They have pleaded not guilty. The courts will ultimately have to examine the evidence.But there is a bigger question staring Nigeria in the face:How much dissent can a democracy tolerate?
Because democracy is not tested when everyone agrees with those in power.Democracy is tested when somebody stands in a crowd and says something the government does not want to hear. “TINUBU MUST GO.”
Those words may anger supporters of the President. They may offend political loyalists. They may be dismissed as provocative, foolish or premature.But disagreement is not treason. Opposition is not automatically a crime. And a political slogan does not, by itself, become dangerous simply because it is directed at the person occupying the highest elected office in the country.
If the five men committed other offences, let the evidence be produced. Let the prosecution prove its case. Let the court determine the facts.But if the real offence was simply wearing a shirt that expressed political dissent, then Nigeria has a much bigger problem than five arrested protesters. It has a problem with the meaning of democracy itself.
Governments possess enormous power. Citizens possess something much smaller but enormously important: the right to speak. That right becomes meaningless if citizens are free to praise those in power but afraid to condemn them.
A government confident in its record should not need silence to defend itself. Answer criticism with performance.Answer anger with results.Answer slogans with facts.
But do not confuse dissent with disorder simply because dissent is uncomfortable.The police say the case is about criminal conduct, not politics. Amnesty says politics is at the heart of it.The courtroom must now separate allegation from evidence.And Nigerians should be watching.
Because tomorrow the slogan could be different.The politician could be different.The government could be different.But the principle will remain the same:Can an ordinary Nigerian stand up, criticize the government and demand political change without fear of the state? That is the question. And it deserves an answer.
TINUBU MUST GO may be a slogan. But the right to say it—or to disagree with it—goes to the heart of what a democracy is supposed to protect.
 |
|
