There comes a point when a government's explanations, excuses, and public relations campaigns collapse under the sheer weight of reality. Nigeria has reached that point. Three years into President Bola Ahmed Tinubu's administration, insecurity has metastasized into a national catastrophe. From the forests of Zamfara to the communities of Plateau, from the highways of Kaduna to the troubled villages of Borno, Nigerians are living through a nightmare that grows darker by the day. Citizens are kidnapped in broad daylight. Farmers abandon their fields. Communities are overrun. Schools are attacked. Families are held hostage. And increasingly, the Nigerian state appears powerless to stop it.
The death of retired Major General Abubakar Rabe in bandit captivity should have shocked the conscience of the nation. Here was a man who dedicated his life to defending Nigeria, only to die at the mercy of criminals in the very country he once served. If a retired general can be kidnapped and die in captivity, what hope remains for ordinary Nigerians?
Yet on the very same day Nigerians mourned General Rabe, terrorists reportedly attacked communities in the Chibok axis and burned school facilities, reopening wounds that never truly healed. More than a decade after the Chibok abductions became a global symbol of Nigeria's security failures, the nation finds itself confronting the same demons. The symbolism is devastating.
This is not merely a security challenge. It is an indictment of leadership. The first responsibility of any government is the protection of lives and property. Everything else; economic reforms, political calculations, international diplomacy, infrastructure projects is secondary. A government that cannot guarantee basic security is failing at its most fundamental obligation.
The Tinubu administration frequently points to military operations, security meetings, and intelligence initiatives. Yet Nigerians judge governments not by press releases but by outcomes. The outcome today is that kidnapping has become an industry. Terrorism remains resilient. Banditry flourishes. Entire communities remain vulnerable. Citizens travel highways with fear and uncertainty.
What makes the situation even more troubling is the growing disconnect between official rhetoric and public reality. Nigerians are repeatedly told that progress is being made, yet daily headlines tell a different story. Religious leaders are declaring national days of mourning. Civil society groups are demanding tougher measures. Legislators are openly arguing that the country's security architecture is no longer fit for purpose.
When the Christian Association of Nigeria designates a "Black Sunday" to honor victims of insecurity, that is not merely a religious event. It is a national alarm bell. When senior lawmakers publicly argue that Nigeria's centralized policing structure cannot cope with modern security threats, that is not routine political debate. It is an admission that the current system is failing. When citizens increasingly rely on prayers because confidence in state protection has eroded, that is not evidence of faith alone. It is evidence of institutional weakness.
The tragedy is that Nigeria possesses enormous human, military, and economic resources. What appears lacking is the urgency, innovation, and strategic coherence required to confront a crisis that has evolved far beyond conventional law enforcement. Criminal networks have adapted. Terrorists have adapted. Kidnappers have adapted. The question Nigerians are asking is whether their government has adapted with equal speed.
Security cannot be governed through speeches. It cannot be solved through ceremonies. It cannot be defeated through optimism. It requires accountability. It requires intelligence-driven operations. It requires structural reforms. It requires ruthless disruption of criminal financing networks. It requires stronger local security partnerships. Above all, it requires leadership that treats insecurity not as one challenge among many, but as the defining emergency of the moment.
History will not judge this administration by the promises it made. It will judge it by whether Nigerians became safer under its watch. Today, too many Nigerians are afraid to travel, afraid to farm, afraid to sleep, and afraid that help will not come when danger arrives. That fear is the most damning verdict of all. A nation of more than 200 million people should not be governed as though mass insecurity is normal. The death of General Rabe, the continued attacks on vulnerable communities, the persistence of kidnappings, and the widespread sense of insecurity are not isolated incidents. They are symptoms of a deeper failure.
The Tinubu administration must confront an uncomfortable truth: Nigerians are losing confidence in the state's ability to protect them. Restoring that confidence will require more than assurances. It will require results. And results are precisely what have been missing.
 |
|
